Navigation Guide

A practical toolkit for boards ready
to lead with Nature in governance

The Governance Gap

Does this sound familiar?

"We report on nature, but we've never asked what nature would say about our decisions."

"We manage nature as a risk, but we've never learned from how nature manages risk—with 3.8 billion years more experience than any board."

"Nature underwrites 100% of our economy and every life within it, but has never held a share, received a dividend, or appeared on a balance sheet."

With concrete frameworks and practical tools, this toolkit closes the governance gap — giving your board a clear starting point and direction, no matter where you are today on your journey.

Start Here

Got 5 minutes? Try one of these.

Why This Toolkit

iThe Fundamental Recognition

Our economies are not standalone constructs inhabited by humans. They emerge from and are embedded within the living biosphere. One hundred percent of our economies depend on the rest of the natural world. The unlimited potential of human inventiveness is entirely dependent on the six inches of topsoil and the microbial community that enables all of life.

Consider how a single corporation's operations connect to the living world. The water flowing through manufacturing processes first fell as rain, was filtered through forests and soil, and carried nutrients that sustain countless organisms. The energy powering facilities ultimately derives from photosynthesis. The materials forming products began as minerals created through geological processes spanning millions of years.

Yet our current economic thinking treats these connections as externalities, costs and benefits outside our accounting systems. We operate as if businesses exist in isolation from the ecological processes that make them possible.

iiThe Crisis of Relationship

Traditional corporate governance was designed for a different world. Its frameworks assume nature is an inexhaustible resource, that environmental costs can be externalized without consequence, and that fiduciary duty extends only to human shareholders.

0
Average monitored wildlife population decline since 1970 (WWF Living Planet Report 2024)
0
Of global GDP (55%) is moderately or highly dependent on nature and its services (PwC 2023)
0
Organizations adopting TNFD-aligned nature-risk reporting (TNFD 2025)

The illusion is now collapsing. The World Economic Forum ranks environmental risks among the top global threats. The Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) is becoming the standard for nature risk reporting. The EU's CSRD mandates biodiversity disclosure. Legal opinions across jurisdictions indicate directors may face liability for failing to address nature-related risks.

These aren't distant environmental problems. They represent the breakdown of the life-support systems that make human societies and economies possible.

iiiA Different Path

Imagine a corporate boardroom where the voice of the watershed is heard alongside the chief financial officer; where the health of local ecosystems influences quarterly decisions; and where the wellbeing of future generations carries equal weight with current shareholder returns.

This vision represents the essence of nature-conscious governance: a fundamental transformation in how organizations make decisions by recognizing nature as an active participant rather than a passive resource.

Instead of asking "How can we maximize short-term profits?" we might ask "How can our activities contribute to the flourishing of ecosystems that sustain the regional economy?"

ivFrom Extraction to Regeneration

Current business models operate on what we might call an extractive paradigm, a worldview that treats the natural world as a collection of resources to be harvested, converted into products, and consumed. This linear "take-make-waste" approach assumes infinite resources and unlimited capacity for the planet to absorb our impacts.

Natural systems, by contrast, operate on fundamentally regenerative principles that create positive-sum outcomes where the success of individual elements enhances the wellbeing of the whole. In a healthy forest, nothing is truly wasted. The fallen leaves of autumn become the soil nutrients that feed next spring's growth.

vWhat This Toolkit Provides

This is not another ESG framework or sustainability reporting guide. It operates on a different premise: that nature is not merely a category of risk or an input to production, but a stakeholder with legitimate interests, an investor underwriting our businesses and economies, a source of governance wisdom, and a partner in long-term organizational flourishing.

The toolkit works on two levels simultaneously. It helps boards meet emerging regulatory requirements and manage nature-related risks. It also invites boards to learn from 3.8 billion years of natural system design, applying nature's strategies for resilience, adaptation, and regeneration to governance itself.

Organizations that integrate nature into governance go beyond risk management. They attract talent that cares about purpose, earn trust from communities and regulators, and build the adaptive capacity needed for an era of ecological disruption.

viThe Experimental Nature of This Work

This toolkit represents emerging practice, not established doctrine. The field of nature-conscious governance is young. While the tools draw on established governance frameworks, biomimicry research, indigenous wisdom traditions, and pioneering organizational experiments, much remains untested at scale.

Legal frameworks for nature governance vary across jurisdictions. What is legally straightforward in one country, such as appointing nature as a voting board member, may require creative alternatives elsewhere. Cultural adaptation matters too: governance traditions, decision-making norms, and relationships with nature differ across cultures. These differences strengthen the work rather than limit it.

Organizations using these tools are participants in a collective experiment, and that is part of the point. Those building nature-conscious governance today are shaping what corporate leadership looks like next.

viiA Note on Terminology

Throughout this toolkit, "nature proxy" and "nature representative" are used interchangeably to describe individuals who speak for nature's interests in governance processes. Some organizations prefer "proxy" for its legal resonance; others prefer "representative" for its accessibility. The function is identical: ensuring nature has voice in decisions that affect it.

Pioneers & Precedents

Nature governance is not theoretical. Organizations and jurisdictions around the world are already making it real:

Faith in Nature
First company to appoint "Nature" as a legally voting board member in 2022, creating genuine legal precedent for ecological board representation.
Patagonia
Transferred company ownership to the Holdfast Collective and Patagonia Purpose Trust, locking environmental mission into the corporate structure permanently.
Te Awa Tupua (NZ)
New Zealand granted the Whanganui River legal personhood in 2017, recognizing the river as an indivisible, living whole with rights and interests of its own.
Ecuador's Constitution
The first country to enshrine Rights of Nature in its constitution (2008), granting nature the right to exist, persist, and regenerate its vital cycles.

Your organization can join them.

Nature doesn't just need our protection. Nature requires our active collaboration. This toolkit is in service of that deeper work.
Nature on Board

The Skill of Multiperspectivity

In a world of increasing complexity, the most consequential governance failures share a common root: decisions made from too narrow a vantage point. Boards that see only through the lens of quarterly returns consistently miss risks that are visible from other angles.

Multiperspectivity is the capacity to approach a situation from several viewpoints simultaneously, to hold space for seemingly contradictory information, and to find wisdom in the tensions between them.

The question shifts from "who is right?" to "what can we see from here that we cannot see from there?"

Boards are structurally prone to perspective blindness. Directors often share similar professional backgrounds, educational paths, and socioeconomic positions. None of this is malicious. But it creates systematic blind spots that no amount of data can correct, because the problem is not missing information but missing viewpoints from which to interpret information.

When practiced consistently, multiperspectivity enables boards to identify root causes rather than symptoms, anticipate unintended consequences, design interventions that account for multiple affected parties, and surface assumptions that would otherwise remain invisible.

Nature governance is, at its core, an exercise in radical multiperspectivity. It asks boards to consider viewpoints that have no voice in conventional governance: the river, the forest, the species facing extinction, the generations not yet born. This is not sentimentality. It is recognition that these perspectives contain information essential to good decision-making.

The tools in this toolkit are designed to build this capacity progressively. Each tool invites a different form of perspective-taking, from the structured assessments that surface hidden assumptions to the immersive simulations that allow board members to temporarily inhabit non-human viewpoints.

The progression through the Five Models, from Inspiration to Public-Planet Partnerships, can be understood as a deepening of multiperspective capacity. Boards that develop this capacity make better decisions, not because they have abandoned shareholder interests, but because they can see those interests in a fuller context.

Three Dimensions of Nature Governance

Most existing frameworks focus only on the first dimension: governing for nature through risk management and compliance. This toolkit goes further. All three dimensions need to work together: protecting nature, learning from nature, and partnering with nature.

Every tool in this toolkit operates across three complementary dimensions:

Governing FOR Nature
Protect & Manage
Ensures nature-related risks, impacts, and dependencies are identified, assessed, and managed. Addresses regulatory requirements, fiduciary duties, and stakeholder protection. Treats nature as a legitimate interest that governance must account for.
Governing AS Nature
Learn & Transform
Learns from natural systems to strengthen governance itself. Applies nature's strategies for resilience, distributed intelligence, adaptive capacity, and regeneration to organizational design and decision-making.
Governing WITH Nature
Partner & Reciprocate
Establishes reciprocal relationships where nature participates as partner, shareholder, and supplier. Natural capital becomes an investment. Nature receives dividends. Ecosystems are compensated for services.

The most powerful results come from holding all three simultaneously. A board that governs FOR nature without governing AS nature may achieve compliance but miss opportunities. A board that governs AS nature without governing WITH nature may transform processes but fail to establish reciprocal economic relationships. Integration across all three dimensions creates governance that is compliant, wise, and genuinely collaborative.

Five Models for Nature's Role

Organizations can bring nature into governance through five progressively deeper models. These are not rigid stages but options that can be combined and adapted.

Model 01 Entry Point
Nature as Inspiration
Declares Nature as central to the organisation's purpose, mission, and decision-making culture.
FOR AS WITH
Nature becomes the question every decision is measured against, but does not yet have a formal governance seat. Companies like Willicroft and Blyde have appointed Mother Nature as CEO, making ecological impact a threshold test for every strategic choice. This suits organisations beginning the journey or using purpose-driven declarations to shift culture before structure.
In practice: Willicroft, Europe's only plant-based cheese B Corp, appointed Mother Nature as CEO. Every employee now asks "what would Nature think?" before making decisions—from supply chain choices to investor screening.
Model 02 Intermediate
Nature as Advisor
Establishes a formal consultory role for Nature within governance. Nature has voice but not vote.
FOR AS WITH
This can be policy-based or legally entrenched with a formal mandate in constitutional documents. Representatives may be individuals, such as the Zoönomic Institute's "Speaker for the Living" holding an independent Board Observer position, or collective bodies like Corporate ReGeneration's guardian boards representing planetary boundaries and intergenerational solidarity.
In practice: Organisations certified as Zoöps appointed a Speaker for the Living to their board in an ombudsman capacity. Through the learning process, operations began shifting toward becoming symbiotic with the ecosystems they participate in.
Model 03 Advanced
Nature as Director
Grants nature formal representation through appointed proxies with defined rights and responsibilities.
FOR AS WITH
The nature representative may have speaking rights, voting rights, or veto rights on specific matters. Faith in Nature's appointment of "Nature" as a legally voting board member demonstrates this approach, creating genuine legal precedent where ecological wellbeing becomes fiduciary responsibility.
In practice: Faith in Nature (UK) appointed "Nature" as a board director in 2022, the first company to give an ecosystem a legal vote on corporate decisions.
Model 04 Transformational
Nature as Shareholder
Restructures ownership and legal form to establish nature as an equity holder entitled to returns.
FOR AS WITH
This model recognizes natural capital as an investment. Nature receives dividends from value created. Ecosystem services are compensated as supplier contributions. Patagonia's ownership transformation exemplifies elements of this approach, transferring voting control to structures ensuring environmental mission remains central.
In practice: Patagonia transferred ownership to a purpose trust, ensuring 100% of profits fund environmental protection. Nature became the ultimate shareholder.
Model 05 Frontier
Public-Planet Partnerships
Establishes genuine collaborative relationships where natural systems serve as active partners and innovators.
FOR AS WITH
Nature possesses intelligence, capabilities, and solutions that organizations can partner with directly. Companies partnering with ocean currents to clean marine plastic, collaborating with bee colonies for environmental data, and working with animals to predict natural disasters. This recognizes nature's 3.8 billion years of R&D as a core strategic asset.
In practice: New Zealand granted the Whanganui River legal personhood in 2017. The river now has its own legal standing, represented by two guardians who speak on its behalf.
Model FOR Nature AS Nature WITH Nature
Inspiration Values guide decisions Natural metaphors inform strategy Limited
Advisor Expertise informs risk assessment Ecological principles shape governance Consultative, not yet reciprocal
Director Nature's interests formally represented Governance reflects diverse representation Emerging through agency
Shareholder Nature's interests legally protected Ownership reflects interdependence Full reciprocity: equity, dividends, supplier compensation
Public-Planet Partnership Mutual protection of interests Co-evolution of approaches Active collaboration: commensal to mutually beneficial

Choosing and Combining Models

These five models are not mutually exclusive. Most organizations will combine elements from several models simultaneously. A company might operate primarily at the Advisor level while incorporating Inspiration elements into its culture and piloting Director-level representation for specific decisions.

The right combination depends on your organization's current maturity, legal context, industry dynamics, and ambition. The Governance Readiness Assessment helps identify where you are now. The Interspecies Governance Models tool explores how natural systems handle similar governance questions.

The key insight: moving deeper is not always moving better. The most effective governance integrates the appropriate level of nature representation for your context, then deepens over time as capacity, understanding, and institutional readiness grow. Begin where you are. The framework meets you there.

Find Your Starting Point

Pathway: By Question
Pathway: By Role
Pathway: By Integration Stage
Pathway: By Primary Driver
Pathway: By Available Capacity
Pathway: By Time Available

The Four Modules

Module 01
On-Boarding & Governing
How to bring nature into governance structures. Tools for establishing nature's formal role, defining responsibilities, and creating governance architecture for nature-inclusive boards.
7 Tools
Module 02
De-Risking
How to identify and manage nature-related risks while learning from nature's own risk strategies. Tools for integrating nature into enterprise risk management and meeting disclosure requirements.
6 Tools Coming Soon
Module 03
Restoring
How to align economics and strategy with nature's principles. Tools for rethinking growth, value, and financial relationships through an ecological lens.
5 Tools Coming Soon
Module 04
Embodying
How to change culture, language, and daily practice of governance. Tools for fundamental shifts in consciousness and ongoing ecological practices.
6 Tools Coming Soon

Tool Directory

Role of Nature ProxiesFour models of nature representation in corporate governance. Explore each one, then take a short quiz to find the right starting point for your organisation.
Nature Proxy Appointment CharterBuild a board-ready governance document that formalises nature's seat at the table. Configure your settings, then review and download.
Interspecies Governance Style QuizEight questions across five governance scenarios. Discover which species archetype matches your leadership instincts and what it reveals about your strengths.
Governance Readiness AssessmentEight honest questions about your board. The answers map to one of four governance models, from nature as cultural influence to nature as constitutional stakeholder.
Nature's ESG Code of ConductAssess how well your board integrates nature into governance. 23 questions across 6 key issues with a personalised alignment score and actionable next steps.
Nature-Conscious Board MeetingsStructured agendas with facilitation guidance, discussion prompts, and a downloadable meeting pack. Choose the template that fits where your board is.
Nature Governance LibraryExternal frameworks, templates, and guidance for boards integrating nature into governance.
Board Decision Impact ScreenerScreening tool that assesses the nature-related implications of board decisions before they reach the agenda — evaluating ecosystem impacts, nature-positive alternatives, and community consultation requirements.
Nature's Audit CommitteeFramework positioning nature as an independent auditing authority. Nature functions as a stakeholder whose limits, thresholds, and feedback signals constrain and guide strategy and capital allocation.
Bee Lines of DefenseNature risk strategies for board risk committees, addressing systemic, interconnected, non-linear nature-related risks that traditional frameworks cannot isolate. Integrates 16 resilience strategies from nature.
Risk ForecastingLeverages natural intelligence and real-time biological data from ecosystems — incorporating AI and bioacoustic models to detect emerging threats from ecosystem signals before they materialise.
Nature Grievance MechanismFormal complaint and resolution process for non-human stakeholders. Establishes pathways for ecosystems and nature to raise concerns, preventing larger problems through early resolution.
TNFD Cross-Reference AppendixImplementation guide for translating board discussions into TNFD-aligned processes and disclosures. Designed for sustainability, risk, finance, and strategy teams.
Masters of ScaleEducational framework contrasting conventional scaling (bigger units, centralised control) with nature's spreading strategy (more units, distributed intelligence, local adaptation). Addresses the scaling trap where growth erodes resilience.
Economic Autopsy ProtocolPost-mortem framework that dissects past decisions to reveal underlying economic assumptions. Applies an ecological economics lens — the 10 Laws of Ecological Economics — to surface what conventional framing obscured.
Nature on the Balance SheetGovernance framework treating ecosystems as infrastructure, business partners, and founding shareholders. Shifts from measuring outputs to measuring ecosystem vitality, resilience, and regenerative capacity alongside profit.
Nature-Conscious FinanceHeatmap navigating evolution from traditional nature-positive investments to instruments recognising ecosystems as stakeholders and co-owners. Shows how to structure financial flows and compensation mechanisms.
Board Maturity MatrixSelf-assessment evaluating board maturity in fiduciary approach to nature across three levels: Responsible (baseline compliance), Remunerable (ecosystem as partner), and Reciprocal (ecosystem as primary investor).
Nature's Board LanguageInteractive worksheet and facilitation guide using nature metaphors for governance challenges. Contains 11 nature-inspired metaphors — from Pollinator Profits to Octopus Intelligence — that unlock fresh perspectives for boardroom deliberation.
Ecological Values InventoryExercise template revealing alignment and conflicts between personal, corporate, and ecological values. Uses the LIFE evaluation framework: Life-affirming, Interconnected, Future-oriented, and Equitable.
Interspecies Board Meeting SimulationArts-based, facilitated council bringing more-than-human voices into strategic decision-making. Participants adopt species perspectives to reframe priorities, expand empathy, and surface overlooked dimensions of governance decisions.
The Skill of MultiperspectivityStructured rotation exercise before key board decisions. Builds capacity to hold multiple viewpoints simultaneously, addressing governance failures stemming from narrow decision-making vantage points. 15–20 minute format.
Embodying Board Skills MatrixNature-conscious board self-assessment diagnostic evaluating stewardship capacity across 6 dimensions and four maturity levels: Foundational, Emerging, Integrated, and Regenerative. Includes radar diagram visualisation.
Interspecies Board MeetingsStructured facilitation format for embedding non-human perspectives into routine governance. Complements the Board Meeting Simulation with practical, repeatable meeting templates for ongoing use.

Using This Guide

This introduction provides orientation to the toolkit. Each tool contains detailed guidance, templates, and implementation advice. Read this guide fully before selecting your first tools, then return when navigating between modules.

The toolkit is designed for adaptation. Legal frameworks for nature governance vary across jurisdictions, and what is possible in one country may require creative alternatives in another. Cultural context matters too: the language, metaphors, and governance traditions that resonate in one organization may need translation for another. Modify tools to fit your context, culture, jurisdiction, and sector. The principles transfer; the specifics require local interpretation.

Nature governance is also not a solitary pursuit. Share your experiences, adaptations, and innovations with the broader community. The practices evolve through collective learning, and every organization that experiments with nature-inclusive governance contributes to a growing body of knowledge that benefits all.

Nature governance is part of a larger shift: moving from extractive to regenerative relationships with the living world.

Nature doesn't need better frameworks. Nature needs humans willing to listen, learn, and change. These tools are in service of that deeper work.

The Invitation

Every board has a choice. Continue governing as if nature is external to business: an input to be optimized, a risk to be managed, a cost to be minimized. Or begin the harder, more rewarding work of governing with nature as a partner and teacher.

The organizations that thrive in the coming decades will be those that learned to collaborate with the living systems they depend on.

This toolkit gives you the structures and practical tools to begin, or to deepen the work you have already started. Nature is already at the table. The question is whether your board will take its seat alongside.

Glossary

Ecological Concepts
An approach requiring development to leave biodiversity in a measurably better state than before. In the UK, developers must deliver a minimum 10% biodiversity net gain as a condition of planning permission.
The practice of learning from and emulating nature's strategies to solve human design challenges. In governance, biomimicry applies nature's 3.8 billion years of tested solutions (distributed intelligence, adaptive feedback loops, symbiotic relationships) to organizational design and decision-making.
EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and its biodiversity standard (European Sustainability Reporting Standard E4). Requires large companies to report on biodiversity impacts, dependencies, risks, and opportunities using standardized metrics.
The practice of examining every governance decision through two complementary perspectives: a conventional business lens (risk, return, compliance) and an ecological lens (ecosystem impact, regenerative potential, interspecies fairness). The dual lens does not replace business thinking. It enriches it.
The mass destruction of ecosystems. A growing international legal movement seeks to establish ecocide as a criminal offense under international law, making those responsible for severe environmental destruction personally liable.
Benefits humans receive from nature: clean water, pollination, climate regulation, flood protection, fertile soil, and more. Valued at an estimated US$125 trillion per year globally, yet largely unaccounted for in corporate balance sheets.
Governance Frameworks
The dominant economic model that treats nature as an infinite supply of free resources to be extracted and consumed. Nature on Board challenges this paradigm by reframing the relationship from extraction to reciprocity, from exploitation to partnership.
The legal obligation of board directors to act in the best interests of the organization. Nature-extended fiduciary duty recognizes that long-term organizational health is inseparable from ecological health, and that failing to account for nature-related risks and dependencies is itself a breach of fiduciary responsibility.
The right of indigenous peoples to give or withhold consent to projects affecting their lands, obtained before the project begins and based on full information. A foundational principle of rights-based approaches to nature governance.
Governance frameworks that extend beyond human stakeholders to include the interests, strategies, and intelligence of non-human species and ecosystems. Draws on how natural systems, from mycelial networks to bee colonies, make collective decisions, manage resources, and maintain resilience.
The capacity to approach a situation from several viewpoints simultaneously, holding space for seemingly contradictory information and finding wisdom in the tensions between them. In nature governance, this means including perspectives that have no voice in conventional boardrooms: the river, the forest, the species facing extinction, the generations not yet born.
The stock of natural resources (soils, air, water, living organisms) from which ecosystem services flow. Treating natural capital as a genuine investment, with nature receiving dividends from value created, is central to the Shareholder and Public-Planet Partnership models.
A commitment to halt and reverse nature loss by 2030, measured against a 2020 baseline. Goes beyond "do no harm" to actively improve biodiversity, ecosystem function, and natural capital. The global goal, adopted at COP15, requires businesses to contribute to restoring nature rather than merely minimizing damage.
A designated individual who represents nature's interests in governance processes, speaking on behalf of ecosystems, species, and future generations. The proxy operates with defined authority, ecological expertise, and a mandate that prioritizes long-term ecological wellbeing alongside business objectives.
Legal & Regulatory
Nine Earth-system thresholds (climate change, biodiversity loss, land-system change, freshwater use, biogeochemical flows, ocean acidification, atmospheric aerosols, ozone depletion, and novel entities) within which humanity can safely operate. Six of nine boundaries have already been crossed, making nature governance not optional but urgent.
Where serious or irreversible harm is possible, lack of scientific certainty should not prevent protective action. A cornerstone of nature governance that shifts the burden of proof: decisions that may harm ecosystems must demonstrate safety, rather than opponents having to demonstrate harm.
Governance that goes beyond sustainability (maintaining the status quo) to actively restore and enhance the health of natural systems. A regenerative board does not merely reduce harm. It designs decisions, processes, and economic relationships that leave ecosystems stronger than before.
The legal and philosophical framework recognizing that ecosystems and species possess inherent rights to exist, thrive, and regenerate, independent of their utility to humans. Ecuador's constitution (2008), New Zealand's Te Awa Tupua Act (2017), and Spain's Mar Menor lagoon ruling (2022) are landmark examples. Rights of Nature provides the legal foundation for many Nature on Board governance models.
An ownership structure where the company is held in trust for its mission rather than for private financial returns. Profits serve the purpose, not the other way around. Patagonia's transfer to the Holdfast Collective and Purpose Foundation models demonstrate how steward ownership can permanently enshrine nature's interests in corporate DNA.
Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures. A risk management and disclosure framework for organizations to identify, assess, manage, and report on nature-related dependencies, impacts, risks, and opportunities, aligned with the TCFD climate framework.

Ready to Begin?

Start with a self-assessment to discover your organization's readiness, or explore how nature proxies operate in the boardroom.

1 Take the Assessment 5 min
2 Explore Your Model 5 min
3 Build Your Framework Ongoing
01 Introduction